BBFC: Hynek Walloped

Once more, we lack English dialogue and the crucial plot start: justice must not just be done (firm-handed) but also seen/heard, which requires an explicit ‘trial’ spelling out the lout’s spankable sin(s), especially as he is said to protest, so evidence such as a witness would not go astray.
By the way, the empty chairs suggest Teodor (and Dimitri) seem to miss out on a near-free educational tool: allowing/ordering other spankable squirts to witness their punishable peer’s posterior pain punishment, adding to the spankee’s humbling and motivation to ‘take it like a man’, which in hot-hided hottie Hynek’s heinie-hardship-case might require more effort to control his yelping and stop the protest timely or forget about it. 
As for the thrashed-tail-tightening merits of standing up a spankee, I have my doubts if it is at least as effective as being bent over deep, as OTK, which has the benefit of eerily-explicitly exposing the privates-privacy-privation. We might ask the knaves to testify from experience, except they might as well lie to spare their bacon the worse, so that causes an interesting challrnge: how to test that ‘under torture’, say during a ‘maintenance spankings’ program?